No Credible And Clear Evidence Exists Today That The Late Iconic UFW Leader César E. Chávez Was An Alleged Pedophile Or Engaged In Sexual Abuse Of Women And Young Girls

Isn't it astonishing that MAGAs and Latinos for Trump protect their own alleged White pedophile U.S. President today, while other Latinos/as in the U.S. can't protect one of their own who was the iconic UFW labor movement leader who fought against unjust working and living conditions, low wages and discrimnatory practices affecting farm workers nationwide. 

It only took less than three days to erase the César E. Chávez legacy, assassinate his character and to taint a dark cloud over the UFW labor movement by merely making unproven allegations of sexual assault after 33 years of Chávez death.

Chávez passed away in 1993 as an innocent man without any criminal history for sexual assault.

The fake Chávez life-long supporters quickly condemn him without a doubt.

It seems that Latinos/as in the U.S. can be easily manipulated and conditioned not to exercise any common sense and without any conscience threw Chávez under the bus for unprofound allegations without having any remorse.

You can be the judge:

The New York Times (NYT) reporters that reported the allegations that Chávez was an alleged sexual predator and rapist, are now trying to justify their years long investigation.

• They reported that they looked at emails going back ten years of the UFW and other sources that talked about the Chávez allegations (rumors). But, that's what they are rumors and allegations.

• They interviewed at least 60 people including Chávez's relatives, but the reporters can't claim that even one of those interviewed was a witness to any of the sexual abuse allegations that were raised.

• The NYT reporters couldn't cite any credible evidence like recorded video, recorded phone calls that show Chávez attempting to groom and entice any young girl under 15, no photos of Chávez groping or sexually abusing women or young girls exists today and the list goes on. It seems that the only credible evidence that the NYT has against Chávez are the allegations raised, which are not facts and can't be proven after 33 years after Chávez death and at least more than 60 years when they allegedly occurred.

Posted on March 22, 2026 by H. Nelson Goodson, a Milwaukee Southsider in Wisconsin.