Sunday, December 5, 2021

WI Courageous Divorced Mother, Julie Valadez Who Had Her Four Kids Illegally Taken By Alleged Corrupt Waukesha County Family Court Judge Michael J. Aprahamian And GAL Attorney Molly Jasmer Continues To Expose Plight In Facebook

Valadez has had the courage to expose the blatant illegal acts in the Waukesha County family court Branch 9 and its alleged corrupt Judge Aprahamian on her personal Facebook account and the mainstream media has yet to report on the case.

By H. Nelson Goodson 
Hispanic News Network U.S.A.

December 5, 2021

Waukesha, Wisconsin - In the State of Wisconsin, there's apparently no type of accountability against corrupt judges on the bench who at times illegally legislate from the bench and manage to fall between the cracks of justice with virtually no accountability to prevent further Judicial abuse of victims, especially domestic abuse victims seeking a divorce from their abusive and alleged alcoholic spouses.

In the Waukesha County case Julie Valadez v. Ricardo Valadez is an example of such Judicial abuse in Wisconsin by a presiding judge who illegally renders acts that have resulted in preventing Julie from seeing her four autistic kids, since getting a divorce from her abusive spouse. Ricardo has had a history of domestic abuse, alcoholic related court cases and etc., but yet Judge Michael J. Aprahamian from the Waukesha County Court Branch 9 allows him to have access to his kids, which Aprahamian has prevented Julie, their mother from having access to her own kids. 

Also involved is Guardian ad Litem (GAL) attorney Molly Jasmer that Aprahamian assigned to the case who was allegedly accused by Julie of creating a false document order that was submitted to a hospital that prevented Julie from seeing one of her kids when he was admitted. Eventhough, Julie reported the incident to Waukesha police, police and the hospital couldn't produce the false document GAL attorney Jasmer submitted to the hospital without the signature of a judge court order at the time.

This is just a taste of the alleged massive corruption by Judge Aprahamian and GAL attorney Jasmer, but Julie in her personal Facebook account has continued to expose her plight and she had done everything right to file complaints and legal challenges to no avail. Apparently, it seems that there's no real accountability for judges in Wisconsin even when laws are on the books to prevent Judicial abuse, but who holds who accountable? 

The most interesting situation about the Julie case is that no local mainstream media has taken interest in reporting such alleged corruption that definitely involves the Waukesha County clerk including the Waukesha County D.A. who wrote Julie a letter saying that no-wrong doing is occurring (an alleged cover-up?) and the failure to investigate what Julie has been going through for months going on more than a year of suffering from the Waukesha County Judicial abuse that has kept her from seeing her kids.

Judge Aprahamian has held no court hearings to determine, if Julie has actually lost her parental rights to see her kids. It is apparent that Aprahamian has prevented Julie from seeing her kids without any legal due process as guaranteed by both the U.S. Constitution and the Wisconsin State Constitution and state statues.

On August 25, 2021, a motion to vacate Post Judgement order of August 13, 2021 was entered by Attorney William Green  in the Waukesha County divorced case of Julie Valadez v. Ricardo Valadez #2018FA000296, which was reviewed by Judge Aprahamian on August 26, 2021 and denied by Aprahamian as not in the best interests of justice or the best interest of the minor children, according to Waukesha County court Branch 9th records.  Julie Valadez claims that Judge Aprahamian erred on his judgment of motion because he could not enter the best interest standard to violate parental rights as cited in the U.S. Supreme Court decision dated June 5, 2000 in Troxel v. Grandville that, "Parents have a fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children, and a law that allows anyone to petition a court for child visitation rights over parental objections is unconstitutional and infringes on the right. Courts may not use "best interest of the child" standards to overturn parental rights." 

Hispanic News Network U.S.A. (HNNUSA) first exposed Julie's plight on August 18, 2021 with full coverage of the divorce case and alleged illegal acts by Judge Aprahamian and attorneys involved.

Where's the Constitutional adherent Justice for Julie and her kids?

For continued exposure of the alleged corruption saga in the Waukesha County family court Branch 9 follow Julie Valadez on her personal Facebook account.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment